Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
Hey there, I have added it to the description, yeah they were not supposed to have a cavalry as they are sitting inside a castle ;). The objects are exactly the way the are shown in the description :).
Comon lets get it out beta alreadyy
Bump
Hey @smile67 yeah im having the same problem, nothing is working. Thanks a lot for the feedback, hope its gonna start working soon again, your 4 points surely would be a help in getting this thing out of beta some time this decade :D
Hey sorry for the late reply, codewars did not send me a notification until now, seems a bit buggy at the moment. Did you figure out what the problem was?
Should be fine now I think ;)
hehe thanks, not a 100% DRY but whatever xD
Lets get this out of beta :)
Thanks :)
Nvm, actually you are right, it should return {50: 1, 20: 0, 1: 11}, just woke up(slow brain :P). Ill rephrase it again, it should use the higher levels always if the remainder is still solvable with the remaining levels so it should take the 50 and ignore the 20
Yes there are, and in this case taking 50 would result in it not being solvable even though it is, so its not possible to take that level. So thats what I meant by as high levels as possible. So here you would skip 50 and use 20 3 times resulting :
{50: 0, 20: 3, 1: 0}
. I will try to make it clearer ;).However your solution didnt make the changes xD
You are right, still had a little bug, could you try it again to see if the issue is fixed now, thanks a lot :)
Thanks, missed that :P
Yeah i had already noticed that and was working on a solution, its fixed now and updated with a couple more test cases and better error message.
Thanks for the help ;)
Thankyou very much for pointing that out, my first random tests with a recursive function, big mistake there, won't happend again xD. Should be fine now.
Loading more items...