Technically, all translations are now using that formula (some of them are abs() < 1e-N, others have built-in test methods, but that's another story), therefore, this suggestion may be resolved

To be fair I mainly follow PEP8 because it's a good (imo) way to make my code more readable

In my defence, this is the first time I've ever heard of PEP-8.

here we go again, not following PEP-8

would someone mind explaining as to how lambda is used in this as well as what reduce does?.
much appreciated.

I don't know if your code is correct, but you must find a way to do the calculation without computing n!!, because this is a very expensive operation; moreover in some languages (like JS) ordinary numbers cannot hold such huge values (which may be the reason of your code failure).

c++ translation???

Both approved, thanks.

Can't to approve due to a conflict in the description.
Forks with the correct description for COBOL and Go.

Oh god. I think it isnt 7 kyu

C Translation (author inactive).

This kata is a subject to deduplication process here: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/197.
Please join the discussion to help us identify duplicate kata and retire them.