Glad you enjoyed it! :)

Ya I found a conversation on here where somebody said that the original author just had to go in and fork the changes, so thats what I did. I then was able to accept your translation and we were in business!

I would still like to try to get that translation to work, but haven't been able to find where a solution might be. Any thoughts on it?

Same message unfortunately. I feel like I must have done, or am doing, something wrong but I dont know what...

I am attempting to approve it but keep getting this message:

Description cannot be approved, recent changes from related record must be merged first.

Can you help me out with what that means?

Hey so it looks great to me, only thing I would say (and I'm saying this because I don't know if I can edit it after I approve it), is that I'm thinking in the description page the declarations as "String" variables would be uneccesary since its in Python and you're implenting it using a class structure. And also, as I'm writing this I think you might be editing it...so my suggestion might be irrelevant.

Ok so in response to each of your suggestions I did the following:

1. I tried to fix this confusion the best I could, and changed the raptor variable to velociraptor, the TRex variable to T_Rex, as well as deadDino to dead_dino. I then included notes that try to make sure you know what is expected in the output string for these two cases that are different. I want to keep the output grammatically appealing, if that makes sense. What I mean is I didn't really want output to look like: "A T_Rex is eating a dead_dino". If you think that is the better option I could change that as well.
2. I attempted to simplify it a little bit and I do think it is much clearer now, I could see where I got a little wordy in the middle
3. I changed all reference to trees to leaves.
   Let me know if you have additional suggestions or if you disagree with my logic anywhere in the changes I just made.

Thanks!

Also, if anyone could help me out on how to format my examples in the description portion to make them look like they're supposed to, that would be great! Thanks!

I added a line into the description for that case, I thought it might be a little more interesting for users to figure out what could eat what but I can see why the confusion would be frustrating. And as for the differences that was something I changed last minute and I didn't catch all of the changes I needed to make so I think I got that fixed too.

I am relatively knew to the site and this is my first feedback I'm leaving, but in my opinion I think the description of the task could be a bit more detailed. I was pretty sure that I knew what was being asked, but in comparison with the approved kata that I have encountered I believe it lacks the same substance as it currently stands. Examples of acceptable and unacceptable output would be effective, of course. The reason why I think it would benefit from more explanation is because I have actually worked on two separate versions of this problem. One that was much like this one, and another involving balancing sets of the three kinds of brackets: (), [], {}.