Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
Please remove the requirement for returning
undefined
. The C# version does away with it, for the better. It adds little to the Kata and instead makes translating the task more inconvenient.This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
nice
Also this one: https://www.codewars.com/kata/5a02a758ffe75f8da5000030
Damn, I find the current kata the best quality of those 3. I don't know how to proceed. Leave this one in beta, or start a deduplication process ..
I believe this kata is more interesting and has better quality as an earlier approved kata (with low satisfaction rating): https://www.codewars.com/kata/527f782024b930114700076e.
I would approve this one, and on deduplication get the other one retired.
Euclid would be proud of you :D
My main concern is that solutions of this kata are not substantially different from existing approved Hanoi Tower katas. So I propose to introduce a new requirement which makes this kata more challenging and different from already approved katas. This new requirement will invalidate all existing solutions but it is fine for an old beta kata with a few solutions.
I only see this now, no longer get much notifications around here. Is there a type of current solutions you would like to see invalidated by introducing this new parameter?
Here is my idea: Add a new parameter
start
. The task is to return solution steps starting from the given stepstart
(and with the given number of disks). For example:Do you think it is a good idea?
Give me a week to remember what I was going to add to this kata and to implement new requirements.
Also, this kata adds progess indication and lazyiness to the task.
Any news on this, or should we go ahead with approval?
Compilations tests should be added for cases like
calc.One.One.One
orcalc.One.Plus.Plus.Times
duplicate issue
Loading more items...