You have a bug in your code. Double check for invisible characters.

There should be no trailing white space at the end of each line, or new line characters at the end of the string.

Thanks a lot

Nice kata, you do however need a negative test case as well as a test case that doesn't use assert_equals (Ruby) See @danielpclark's solution, which cheats your entire test suite.

Can you post your full solution as a spoiler comment?

@joshrainwater that's not an issue as it doesn't affect the test outcome and is just the character not rendering properly on the site. However, to get rid of the confusion I reduced the dimension for that test case so it renders correctly.

Could you please answer? In a 44 block, i have 12 spaces, and 3 newlines. In 55, 20 spaces, 4 newlines, Isn't that correct?

I've noticed in my test output, in the sample, there are a couple undefined characters mixed in the sample output somehow on the longer test that makes it fail.

■ □ ■ ��� ■ □ ■

Maybe that's causing issues? Is it a Unicode issue here as well maybe?

This is the output i get:
var res = string.split(" ");
document.write(res);
□,■,□,■ ■,□,■,□ □,■,□,■ ■,□,■,□
var res = string.split("\n");
document.write(res);
□ ■ □ ■,■ □ ■ □,□ ■ □ ■,■ □ ■ □
Isn't this what you ask for?

Check for extra white space or new line characters. From the description:

There should be no trailing white space at the end of each line, or extra new line characters at the end of the string.

Hello,
It appears that i have the same issue. I'm writing with JS, and the output is the exact same of what's requested, but says not a match. The space, and new lines are in place.
Could you please see what's going on, or if you want, see my code?

Hi,

Python: I am getting timeout issue.. not sure why

when I run it on my system with below tests, it takes only <=500ms
print nextPrime(2,3)
print nextPrime(20,300)
print nextPrime(32144322,23452625233)
print gap(4,100,110)
print gap(4,30000,100000)
print gap(2, 10000000, 11000000)
print gap(2, 100000000, 110000000)
print gap(2, 10000000000, 11000000000)
print gap(2, 100000000000, 110000000000)
print gap(2, 100000000430000, 1100000000056450)
print gap(84, 432560923690632432, 93274782356043246324324)

I tried some hacks..

this fails as expected (None should equal [30109, 30113])
def gap(g, m, n):
if n > 11000:
return None

while, this times out
def gap(g, m, n):
if n > 110000:
return None

my script might not be meeting 6sec requirement, but I don't think it should fail like this.. especially as much bigger number on my system does within 500ms..

any suggestions?

Thanks