Your code compares whether a is greater or equal to b in terms of lexicography rather than size

Great, thanks for looking in to it further. I'll keep my eye on github report.

Thanks again!

Hi Andy,

I have added to an already open bug report on Github. You can track it here.

https://github.com/Codewars/codewars.com/issues/617

This is a Codewars issue I hope it gets resolved.

Sorry you are having the issue. I see what you are saying since the Kata appears solved on your profile but your answer does not appear in the Kata. This is a Codewars issue and not something resulting from the Kata code or anyting I can fix. I think I've seen this before on a couple I solved myself as well. I also noticed others have had a similar issue on various Kata and there are bug reports out. I will raise an issue on Github and hopefully Jake can take a look at it.

Hmmm, still no luck. I have just resubmitted my code again and it says it's passed all the tests but it just won't let me look at anyone else's solutions because that screen says I haven't solved it yet. I haven't had this issue with any other katas - I solved about 10 today. This one is in my list of completed kata too so it's definitely odd... Thanks for trying though.

Test Results:

Basic tests

✔ Test Passed: Value == [118.6275, 3.5779]

✔ Test Passed: Value == [215.2265, 68.4014]

Completed in 3ms

Hi Andy... I am not sure what the issue would be. People have been completing it in multiple languages today without any problems. It looks like you were working on it in Ruby. I just restested all languages including Ruby.

My submitted code in Ruby passed the test just fine.

Time: 357ms Passed: 42 Failed: 0
Test Results:
  Basic tests
✔ Test Passed: Value == [118.6275, 3.5779]
✔ Test Passed: Value == [215.2265, 68.4014]
 Completed in 3ms
  Random tests

I am having the same problem here.

I have correctly solved the problem, submit my code only to be told I haven't sovled it.

Not sure what's going one here?

This is a Codewars issue not an issue with the Kata.

Done ^_^

"The pattern should be created using only unit digits" is it enough ?? I'll add it to description later on I'am kind of buzy right now..:)