Thank you for doing this translation! This is the first kata I have authored, so I'm excited that someone liked it enough to translate it.

I'm almost a complete newbie in javascript, so I'm not sure if I know enough javascript to choose one. But I prefer one with newlines since it's slightly easier to read.

Thank you again for doing this.

Aha, I see the problem. Hmm... I'll see if I can modify the test code to utilize hspec's timeout parameter instead of relying on codewars' test timeouts.

I hate it when people still assume list of bytes are valid Strings. It is not true outside of English speaking countries. If you're dealing with list of bytes, do not use the String type.

I wrote "should not take exponential time" in the hspec test header. Is it not displayed when you haven't solved the kata? I can't test because I'm the author.

I marked the kata "Ready" but I'm not sure if it's sufficient to make it as solved. Please tell me if you need something for me to do.

gen15 = choose (0, 16) generates random elements from inclusive range, which means it may generate 16. This also applies to gen7 = choose (0, 8).

Added a test case to check if the algorithm takes exponential time

The dictionary can and do have common prefixes in it. If there's a non-determinism, you can freely choose one of them.

I added some description to clarify that.

Right before the "From ring to field" part:

(Hint: The maximum degree of our polynoms will be smaller than 16.)

Description of 'sliding down the pyramid' should be clearer

The description says the max degree smaller than 16, but test code gives test cases with degree 16

I believe you should ban people just using toList or foldl from Foldable