Exact same problem here with the sample tests - "missing 1 required positional argument: 'ok'" No issues with the random/extended set. Disappointing, otherwise a great little project.

done, thanks for the tip ;-)

Then how about testing all values from 0 to 20?

reported above with update, closing here.

If you ask about Python: I based the translation on C# which has similar random test design. Regards, suic

The problem is in potential number size: (100000, 100000), (1, 1)

ok, mathematically it's perfectly correct. Computationally, I tried to make it fail tripling all tests with a and b equal to 1 (one at a time), but that still stay efficient enough (by far). Soooo... I guess that's ok. ;)

errr, this does work, apparently... ;o

EDIT: damn me, I should go to bed... second time I don't read correctly something this evening... x)

You're welcome! Let me know if issues arise.

Ah, thief :D! Linked in my own description