Thanks for letting me know. Someone else wrote the Ruby translation, and last time I checked I wasn't able to edit it myself. Do you know if that's possible? This is my first kata. I appreciate your help!

Thank you for the feedback. You're absolutely correct that I made a mistake in saying that the answer should be an integer. My apologies. I've corrected the question statement.

I agree with you about the fact that some of the test cases aren't realistic, given the fact that the kata is supposed to be questions on a test, but these tests were suggested by previous users to help test the kata more thoroughly.

I'm not sure what exactly you mean by a hacky string converstion; I did not encounter that issue in my solution. I will gladly make additional changes as appropriate if you have other specific suggestions.

Thanks for your patience. This is my first kata to author, and I'm still learning, as you can see. I appreciate your feedback.

Thanks for the feedback. I went ahead and made the statement that the questions are case sensitive its own line. I hope this helps future coders!

It looks like Souzooka was able to make this change. Let me know if you're not seeing it. Thank you!

Thank you so much! I've approved.

This is great. Thank you so much!

Thanks for the reminder!

Thank you for the suggestion. I've added some random tests that use alternative object keys. Please let me know if you have any other suggestions!

Yes, thanks. I've modified the solution.

Great point. I've updated the example solution. Thanks.

Thanks for this. I've added random tests.

Point taken, thanks. I removed this comment.