Helpful. Thank you!

Hey guys, isn't it suppose to fill/complete the initial functions?

Thanks.

very helpful, thanks

I think there’s absolutely no need to depend on such micro-benchmarks. The real bottlenecks are somewhere else. However, each of these conversion methods has its own caveats:

• v.toString() — works well, unless v.toString is not a function, that is when v is null or undefined or when .toString was deliberately changed or deleted (very rare case)
• '' + v — works with nulls and undefineds too, but might give some unexpected results for such objects as:

v = {
  valueOf: function () { return 5 },
  toString: function () { return 'foo' }
}

in which case '' + v would return '5' (very rare case)

• String(v) — works every time, correctly calls .toString method, if an object has one, and works for nulls and undefineds
• '' + [v] or [v].join() — same as String(v) (unless you modified Array.prototype), with exception of nulls and undefineds becoming empty strings, which can be quite usefull sometimes

In the real world, it’s fine to use any of these methods, with caution while using v.toString() when v could be null and undefined. Choose, what’s most convenient/legible/usefull for you and your team. Performance differences are highly negligible.

does this run any slower than the return ''+num solution or the num.toString() method?

interisting, since callee is not encouraged... though this is too complicated for me to understand...

men, its awesome!