Thank you,
Great kata!

In the example where it looped right I thought the end values would end up in reverse order at the beginning of the array e.g. loopArr([1, 5, 87, 45, 8, 9], 'right', 2) => [9, 8, 1, 5, 87, 45]. You should change the examples so there are not two of the same values for clarification, but other than that good problem!

I second this. It's a fair kata for the level - but the examples do a better job at explanation than the problem statement itself.

I think "revolve" should make it clearer. But yeah examples help make sense of it.

changed it

Fine kata for the level
Minor: description has 'reult' where result is ment

Maybe it's just me that thinks the description isn't clear enough.

..had to use common sense by looking at the examples

Great kata!

Should test for not modifying inputs.

Don't allow bad habits!

Thank you! May the Force be with you! :)

Missing tests with steps > arr.length. This is perfectly valid within the description.

I've updated description to make it more clear.
There are a lot of solutions right now, believe it is clear enough to understand what to do and how to do it :)

Description is not clear:

• steps specifies where to start, not a number of steps;
• direction doesn't tell how to loop; real direction is always forward (left to right);