xD

xD

what the heck is this? :D

Kind of sad that an invalid solution is top voted. smh.

No...

Probably because test cases uses 'Function.toString()' and there's some error in the test regex:

function anarchy() {}
anarchy.toString()
"function anarchy() {}"

var anarchy = function () {}
anarchy.toString()
"function () {}"

FUCK THE POLICE!

Wow.
Simply wow.

Invalid solution!

Clever, but slow.

Invalid solution.

Greetings, what do you suggest instead of indexOf?
EDIT: never mind, found out about 'in'.

Yes, you use Regex... but url.indexOf is evil.
Not so good, but clever :)

wrong man!!

Why not === ?