Thank you for your concern :) You would be heartbroken wouldnt you :P

Thanks for completing my kata! Yes you are correct, I just updated the description so hopefully there is no confusion.

Good point, I have been convinced by Blind4Basics, I will update the description in a bit :)

Oh I did miss your last comment! Thank you, at least my assumptions all seem to be correct ;)

Hmmm sorry that you feel that way, I really was trying to convey how much I am taking your comments on board.

Yes I can tell you are not new :P

Your relentlessness has paid off, I shall prune the required information. Can you muster any positive comment about my first kata so maybe I know what is good to do in my next kata? Just a recommendation from someone who is new.

Thank you for your help fixing some of the other things, this is my first kata and I am pretty new on code wars.

I am starting to feel like you are not reading my replies and your negative comments are getting a bit relentless. I have already said why I do not want to explain it (in my view it is regurgitating information that is readily available). You are correct I do not explain what two-line notation means. I am not "hiding" this, I am guiding the user via the links. I expect the user to learn about the inputs from the examples. If you think I should add more, that sounds good to me.

A permutation is called a cyclic permutation if and only if it has a single nontrivial cycle (a cycle of length > 1)

The task is well defined.

I guess it was both, because the test was also creating permutations such as the one you gave above when it shouldnt have. Should be fine now.

Updated.

That should fix it.

Lol, thanks for catching that. Trying to keep up here with the comments!

Oh that is true, will update them now.

No, the issue here seems to be that I accidently made the length of each row be as low as one. In the assumptions part of the description, it clearly states that the input permutation should have at least 2 elements in each row. I have updated the tests so this is true.

I have swapped the actual and expected thanks to the very first comment on this kata (I did so awhile ago, again I am not sure why your version is outdated).

That is odd... they are all tuples for me. Give it a refresh there.

Okay I know you want me to be more verbose. I get it.

Anyway, that is just the solution I went for. Will look into it.