ok :)
thanks for the tip !

the real question is : who do you play with who couldn't tell you the rules ? :d

didn't read the notes, shame on me. While clicking "attempt" I thought "Oh, forgot to take care of 'en passant' !"
Would be nice to make a new kata with all the rules ;)
Anyway, good one, tks !

tip :
"and then empty arrays"

You should add bigger numbers in the tests, at least for python, since the naive approach can pass. Or remove "beware of big numbers" from the description.
Also, as stated by others, the description is not consistent about the sum asked for.

Just make things clearer, will be a perfect kata.

no, we shouldn't
thanks for noticing the small attribute :p

To my opinion, it is useless. You can hard coding only if you got the answer, and there's no huge chance to just guess it.
But I hoped you enjoyed coding the random cases :p. Anyway, that's still an added feature, doesn't hurt.
Thanks to all for helping getting through beta.

I didn't know the for...else structure, thanks guys !
In this particular situation, would you agree that the 'else:' can be removed, or do I miss something ?

yep it's working
pity I just wrote a bypass to the flaw while you were uploading the new one ^^

Thanks, I've learnt a lot through this kata and discovered a lot more interesting things still to be learnt...

Be aware that I could "submit final" with incomplete/bad solutions. If it passed some tests, but threw error on the latests like output error (max buffer lenght reached for example) or even an IndexError, it was still considered as valid.
I don't know if it comes from your particular tests or from a bug in CW python test module.

edit : appears to be a flaw in CW

Hi,
There's an issue with the random tests

Testing for [{'age': 4, 'name': 'Kyoko Hayagawa'}, {'age': 20, 'name': 'Katsutoshi Imai'}, {'age': 3, 'name': 'Taro Koyama'}] and [{'age': 7, 'name': 'Ryoko Morigawa'}, {'age': 18, 'name': 'Shuichi Takasaki'}, {'age': 3, 'name': 'Yuichi Sakakigawa'}, {'age': 1, 'name': 'Ryo Tanaka'}]
It should work for random tests too: 'Katsutoshi Imai' should equal 'Shuichi Takasaki'

Well... 20>18. Or did I miss something ?
And it happened also in various cases (with or without added up ages, for ex. http://pastebin.com/viCwfvjd )