No need of k-means ;)

Also, forgot to take the c+=k out of the try statement in the screenshot, ignore that!

Very interesting, thank you!
I translated the kata into C++.

The C++ translation uses a custom Vector structure hidden in the preloaded header.
This makes solving this otherwise straightforward kata a bit unpleasant and more complicated than it is.
Either the description or the solution set up should contain the structure declaration.

I most definitely agree. It took me a while to figure this one out, on my own without the help of google. Because of all of the head scratching, I will forever be able to code this problem in any language.

This was a really interesting kata, I just translated it into C++.
The way C++ handles Unicode made it a bit more challenging than Javascript (more fun).

A good kata with a bearly understandable description.
Like others said here, read the Wikipedia page before you start coding.

This means that also my solution to the original Javascript kata is wrong... I fixed that too

Incorrect test: Assert::That(Carmichael(4), Equals(1));
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=carmichael%284%29

Error messages differentiate actual and expected values.

Thank you! :)

I think that one of them is clearly wrong, to pass it I hardcoded the specific test case.
This killed the joy of seeing the K-Means algorithm decoding that last message.

Oops I didn't see it, sorry for that... fixed. Why does it matter? I thought it was testing that the two terms were equal.