Ahh that makes sense, thanks!

Sorry. I didn't thought that I'd need to use the spoiler flag when commenting in the soulutions section.

Use spoiler flag next time please.

Clever solution.

nicely done :)

If it was >= then v could take the v = 0 value in the condition and then you would indeed have a division by 0. Without the = sign, the condition goes to the else part and no division by zero is performed.

this gives error when v is 0. should be >=

I really like how you have to be careful in following the directions in the description. Better than a standard replace kata, IMO.

someone didn't like this

what metode is this?
regex?

because the tests are shit and do not assert correctly floating point values...

edit: now it would work

Thank you!

Thanks!