Scala translation

C#: method name should be PascalCase (Please refer to implementation of backward compatibility here )

C#: method name should be PascalCase (Please refer to implementation of backward compatibility here )

I've improved the java tests including the addition of random tests if anyone wants to approve it: https://www.codewars.com/kumite/638f44ccbb8c010058658dc8?sel=638f44ccbb8c010058658dc8

Brainfuck translation if anyone is interested: https://www.codewars.com/kumite/638e1fe259b85d004a0f133f?sel=638e1fe259b85d004a0f133f

Ruby 3.0 should be enabled, check details here and here.

And if possible update the github list.

No random tests in

• C#
• Clojure

No sample tests and random tests in

• Coffeescript
• Java
• Javascript

C# random tests are failing with some weird input. I got the same input twice and expected result differs somehow. An example what is passed inside a method: "3135 5400 3656889".

Though some logs in console show "[3, 1, 3, 5, 5, 4, 0, 0, 3, 6, 5, 6]"

As much as three times the same input can be passed into a method, with two times passing and failing on a third time

Missing random tests in multiple languages (python, ruby, java, js, ...)

The C# version is almost always throwing an error every time when just returning false and running all tests. It appears to be some issue with the "Random Tests".

Random Tests: System.OutOfMemoryException : Out of memory
STDERR: Stack overflow in unmanaged: IP: 0x5d208c, fault addr: 0x7ff0b2bf9ff8

Code:
public class solution
{
public bool validate(string n)
{
return false;
}
}

The C# test cases (example and hidden ones) are wrong.
E.g. for the randomized "110 021 32667" it should return valid, but the test case expects invalid (check here: https://planetcalc.com/2464/)

Same for those example test cases...

The test cases also use the wrong C# order of parameters for AreEqual. And there are two that are exactly the same just pasted after one another..

This (or at least the C# version of it) is a very low effort kata :/ Whoever translated it: shame on you

I am a bit confused on submitting a solution using Test Driven Development.

I have used a list of credit card numbers from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luhn_algorithm, and have validated them with my code and they all pass accordingly.

Invalid: 79927398710, 79927398711, 79927398712, 79927398714, 79927398715, 79927398716, 79927398717, 79927398718, 79927398719
Valid: 79927398713

How can I go about implementing this in TDD form?

I currently have:
Test.assertEquals(validatecard("79927398713"), true);
Test.assertEquals(validatecard("79927398710"), false);