You can use f strings. It doesn't require str(), and it looks more readable.

Mapping str() onto list slices is more readable:

map(str, n[:3])

Yeah, this helps. Thank you very much!

ok i have changed it again hopefully its a bit clearer this time

"The unique position is the position of every different word in the sentence, which excludes repeated words"

i was going to add this, do you reckon that's a good explanation? give suggestions if you have a better idea

i want to keep it short and concise whilst not being too complex to understand

Ah ye, this kata was updated by someone else
ill fix it when im home i promise

Hey man! Sorry. Here's the example of what I mean:
The test phrase The number 0 is such a strange number Strangely it has zero meaning

• Regarding the AC the "Strangely" index is 8
• Regarding the solution(s) the "Strangely" index is 7

This happens due to the discrepancy of implementation and acceptance criteria:

1. In AC we're suggested to add an index of an original sentence (as I read it)

2. In acceptable solution to pass tests we:

   a. condense the sentense to unique set of strings;
   b. return indexes of those

Which, in turn eliminates the repetition of the word "number" from the sentense making the index of "Strangely" = 7

P.S. I am referring to a last assertion in "Basic tests" for the excersise.

thank you

either you said the same thing as the wording
or
i have no clue what you just said

please simplify what you just said, i cant comprehend it :(

The issue here is that Acceptance Criteria provide the wording as
If a word appears more than once in the sentence, your string should return the position of the first occurrence of the word.
so you tend to reference the original sentence.

Meanwhile tests and solutions show, that the "correct" approach is to treat and refer to the 1st occurance in condensed (no repetitions) array of words, which, coincidently, is expected to have the inherited order of the initial sentense.

Approved

python new test framework is required. updated in this fork

i changed it to be less value. is this better

"Your task is to make a program which takes in a sentence and returns a string which shows the position
of each word in the sentence. If a word appears more than once in the sentence, your string should
return the position of the first occurrence of the word. Capitalisation of words should be accounted for:
'BEE' should be considered the same as 'bee'. The sentences include no punctuation."

i changed it to be less vague

"Your task is to make a program which takes in a sentence and returns a string which shows the position
of each word in the sentence. If a word appears more than once in the sentence, your string should
return the position of the first occurrence of the word. Capitalisation of words should be accounted for:
'BEE' should be considered the same as 'bee'. The sentences include no punctuation."

Not a valid suggestion