Awesome idea!!

as a wire fan i really fell bad 4 looking at the solution

i still dont get it right what it means to jump to the side of 5

description i/o speficies string type

So what? Does that mean that char[11] cannot be used to represent a string that is guaranteed to be 10 characters long? I can resolve the issue as is, but I'd rather here your reasoning first.

1. conversion to int has been removed
2. akar-0's solution passed without NT, so added test covers it
3. string length has been added to the description
4. description i/o speficies string type

"Jump to the other side of the 5 on the keypad" is ambiguous , initially I replaced 1 <=> 3, 4 <=> 6 and 7 <=> 9 and was wondering what did I do wrong.

Please check now on all points raised.

Not only that, but it isn't tested if output is NUL-terminated either, is it even required or are input and output just arrays of chars? Are they guaranteed to have exactly 10 chars?

The output type in C is char * but it's never tested that the function actually returns the correct pointer.

Approved :)

C Translation kumited.

approved

COBOL translation.

fixed

fixed