Yeah, got used too much to code editors doing all the indentation. Thanks.

Thanks Katia :)

Happy coding ^_^

Very appreciated, enjoy coding :D

Mh, no spoiler - I won't reduce your fun!

The limitation is still <40 characters as same as the beginning, I've never changed it.
The solutions submitted will be marked as invalid as soon as it failed the test, as seen in those invalid bypassing solutions (marked just after the Anti-Cheat added).

Rechecking the solutions submitted, most are exactly 39 characters in length, and no 40. If there were, they would be marked invalid automatically. =]

Glad you still alive mate, keep coding! ;p

Your idea was right about using those mentioned, especially fromCharCode() function.

Hint: Yes, there is true value you can obtain without coding it directly.
Mainly, you need to bypass using direct character via other methods, which you need to figure out how.

Hope you can complete this kata before the end of this year. ;D

Of course, you can do that. ;-)
But it's not shoter enough to pass that one. :D

You use our solutions to evaluate random tests.
Try to change
return digitsAverage(input);
with
return digitsAverageChecker(input);
in your test function.

There's a ton of random tests -- are they not going through for some reason?

Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!

Thank you! I'm so excited that it has been approved!!

Thanks Katia. I have just updated the description. Please take a look when you have a chance and let me know if my changes help.

I didn't have a numbers test, but I did have an empty string and there's no specification for empty strings, so that should be an invalid input. (Haskell)