I second that

Is it just me or the Random Tests do not match the format of the Sample Tests?

• No point in giving away the formula for calculating the two volumes in initial solution setup

• Description should be language-agnostic

• Function name in description is wrong

I have a solution which passes the random tests about 50% of the time, and the other 50% returns:

expected NaN to be close to NaN +/- 1e-9 ?

yep

I have worked on it accordingly now. Hope this resolves the issue.

but the idea was to not round at all, and use a margin like 1e-9. You can invalidate previous solutions, that's not a problem.

I have worked on it now. Hope this resolves the issue.

I have used assert.approximately to fix the issue.

I have created a separate function now that checks the output elements individually and have used assert.approximately in case of the rounded output. Is it okay now? if you could please verify.

I have solved the issue with the random cases sir.

that's why I said to test sepcifically the last element of that array, that way. You need a custom assertion function, that tests separately the two elements.

assert.approximately only works for numbers though; whereas my function requires an array output. Could you please suggest me an alternate possible solution?

you cannot install packages on CW and I'm not sure that one is available. But you can use assert.approximately from the available chai package.

Alright! I'll work on it right away