?

there's nothing wrong with it, i've checked with the sample tests

have you mutated the input in the example tests? e.g.,

wpp(5,4,4) -> [(0,4)]

However, it is not very intuitve why foo(1)(2, 3) and its variations should not be allowed.

The correct mathematical application of currying is to transform a function

f: X x Y x Z -> R

to a chain of single-argument functions, thus:

f: X -> (Y -> (Z -> R))

and anything else would be considered partial function application.

Although I will unpublish the kata soon, I would like to know: Was this not intuitive from reading the Kata's description or for you personally?

I created similar kata this summer. You can check it, if you interested.

It is called "Concat arguments"

The description hasn't been changed since 3 years ago, and will probably not be changed in the future.

Yeah, I noted the same thing.

Resolved. Let me know if you face more issues.

All fixed now. Please check.

Just an oversight on my part. It shouldn't affect the outcome. Will fix it shortly.

Which language?

Well, although very similar they are not exactly the same. I think this one is slightly more difficult because of the '0...' numbers and other little instructions.
But anyway, even though they are similar, I wouldn't mark it as an issue, but that's only my opinion!!

This issue no longer appears. Closed

same =(

Thanks, yes, although an OOP solution isn't required