@muneer320:

OK, let's be VERY CLEAR: this is the only and unique time you'll be warned about this.

Next time you create alter accounts just to up vote your kata, measures will be taken to forbid you to do it again. Measures can go from forbidding authoring to a bannishment (depending on different factors).

The beta process is quite harsh and I understand this can cause frustrations, but there are reasons it became that harsh, and not all of them are bad. So trying to bypass it like you did is just increasing the frustration on both sides (-> irk the beta testers and you'll get more negative feedback next time). In the end, you're just poring oil in the fire, when doing this.

cheers

Hi,

about the description:

• typos a bit everywhere in the description
• give the specifications before the examples
• it must be specified that each type will be unique in the input (or at least, each valid type)

about the tests:

• no random tests
• no tests with more than 4 elements

cheers

I cannot find it because I've no idea what the name is, but this is a duplicate (I remember building something in the very same way)

tupple -> tuple

And I think we had a similar kata not so long ago.

Thanks for your help I'll try making something better next time.

Wow this got retired really quick. Just so you know, I think the main reason people rated badly is because this is a very common kind of kata. Someone posted the exact same problem only a couple days ago.

The bugfix aspect is interesting for an 8-7kyu kata, you just need to find a more unique problem :)

Why not accept the actual types rather than force solvers to write a mapping?

Random tests are missing.

Typo 'Tupple' in expected result.

Duplicate

Yes that was my fault, thanks for that.

the supplied array

You aren't supplying an array. Do you mean, the supplied number? Integer? Or just "the input will not be empty/negative"?

You can choose what you like, just fix it to not confuse people.

Yea I tried to make it a bit more bigginner friendly. Still there's not much diffrence between them.

Almost the same as this kata, but easier.