im at 49 ...

It can be solved using pure logical inferences. However, you will likely have to sit down with your pen and paper to figure out the implicit and implied rules that are natural extensions to the rule set given.

Not funny:-)
556 people passed the JS kata so I think there are no errors.
Be more precise : which test(s) do(es)n't pass.

Can you please tell me how to solve this problem, I think I removed the js or it is reflected in your

Ok have updated. My original confusion of how to handle the input of slashes I believe to have sorted with a better description and examples. This was due to trying to validate before parsing to a regex pattern.

It should be - I guess I need to re-write this

updated description, clear now?

Tests accept both [[Char]] and [String]. "xox" is very close to ['x','o','x'] in JS.

I would consider this a feature rather than a bug.

Totally unrelated to this: @myjinxin, could you comment on this please?

( just trying to get a notification to you )

I think it's safe to say that the python version is easier.
There is an open issue that the python version will accept O(n*log(n)) solutions and the JS version times a lot out even with O(n).

(that doesn't work anymore... ;) )

Pushing to an object or array takes a long time. Manipulating it is fine, but the time requirement is too strict to push.

oh boy :)