Thought I would post this here for anyone to check out:

Test #23: Your solution succeeded where the original didn't.
Might be that yours is smarter... Or you made a wrong (but successful) guess somewhere ?
Please post a comment in the discourse about that, providing the information below:
 
FAILED TEST !
 
Number of mines: 9
Original map (not necessarily the expected one !):
0 0 1 1 1
0 0 1 x 1
1 1 2 2 2
x 1 1 x 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 0
1 x 1 1 1
1 1 2 2 x
0 0 1 x 2
0 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 0 0
1 x 1 0 0
1 2 2 1 0
1 2 x 1 0
1 x 2 1 0
 
Game map:
0 0 ? ? ?
0 0 ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? 0 0
? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ?
0 0 ? ? ?
0 0 ? ? ?
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
? ? ? 0 0
? ? ? 0 0
? ? ? ? 0
? ? ? ? 0
? ? ? ? 0
 
Your answer:
0 0 1 1 1
0 0 1 x 1
1 1 2 2 2
x 1 1 x 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0 0
1 x 1 1 1
1 1 2 2 x
0 0 1 x 2
0 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 0 0
1 x 1 0 0
1 2 2 1 0
1 2 x 1 0
1 x 2 1 0

Expected:
?

The examples in the description and sample tests only contain increasing times, but this is not a condition of the problem. It would be nice if an example with unsorted times was added.

very good kata!

in JS message like

Testing for:
pros = ["pros-1","pros-2","pros-3","pros-4","pros-5","pros-7","pros-8","pros-10"]
preferences = [["Code progammer","Computer repair","Cook","Data recovery service","Haircut","Handyman","House cleaning","Pet care","President"],["Code progammer","Cook","Haircut","Handyman","House cleaning","President"],["Computer lessons","Computer repair","Cook","Data recovery service","Handyman","President"],["Computer repair","Data recovery service","Haircut","Handyman","Pet care","President"],["Code progammer","Computer repair","Cook","Data recovery service","Handyman","House cleaning","Pet care","President"],["Code progammer","Cook","Data recovery service","Haircut","Handyman","Pet care","President"],["Computer lessons","Pet care"],["Computer repair"]]: expected [ …(10) ] to deeply equal [ …(10) ]

isn't very useful. I see the input but almost no information about expected answer.
That's in Random tests

Took longer than it should. Have a blessed day... NOT

🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀🥀

The answer is written in two examples - look carefully

C# tests generate warnings

tests/Fixture.cs(110,17): warning CS0219: The variable 'passed' is assigned but its value is never used

Sorry, cannot understand "Squeeze them from the left and right sides to the middle, until the characters of some lines come together"
As in testcase 2 line 1 has no spaces in both parts , so both parts are already together, and we don't need to move them!
left = """
II
LLL
oooo
vvvvv
eeeeee
YYYYYYY
oooooooo
uuuuuuuuu"""
right = """
IIIIIIII
LLLLLLL
oooooo
vvvvv
eeee
YYY
oo
u"""
But the test demands to squeeze all other strings, eliminating spaces before sccond parts....

Enabled in this fork

Approved

Why not add m<=n to the description? It's a bit lame to implement a swap of arguments for a 7 Kyu kata.

Lua translation!

• Python fixed in this fork
  (16 --> 80 out of 384 solutions invalidated)

• Ruby fixed in this fork
  (5 --> 14 out of 63 solutions invalidated)

• JavaScript edge cases added in this fork + edit due to assert.deepEqual failing to compare +0 & -0
  (0 --> 105 out of 493 solutions invalidated)

• Haskell edge cases added directly in the edit window
  (0 --> 5 out of 39 solutions invalidated)