why am I laughing at this? I just imagined it in my head. I can't laugh

Example above, explanation below (seems clear to me)

solved some time ago

IIRC renaming katas is "dangerous", and it should not be done. Moreover, it doesn't really matter what the kata's called.

Done some changes but the code was increased.

Added to the description.

I don't really know Ruby, but it looked good. Approved.

If any issues should arise, please post them in this thread as well, so translation author will see them.

Blame him for writing that very lazy test in random tests then. He literally just did this:

Test.assert_equals(functionator(s),sol(s),"It should work for random inputs too")

which is completely different from the JS version, and is also implementation specific (it forces a specific type of solution).

See, this is why I hate shoehorned translations and insufficient specs in the original kata descriptions. Things like this really happen all the time, and people never learn.

Ruby expects functionator("there are two kinds of people")["there"]["are"]["two"]["kinds"]["of"]["people"] == true.

fine, I'll lower it to 1000, just for you :)
edit: you can solve it now

Done!

Thanks again! After a bit of thinking, I've decided to remove the test altogether. There's just too many ways to fool it, and adding more tests is just going to encourage people to find new ways to break them. I've also reworded the description.

@narayanswa30663 .. Well ,

• The Concepts of programming despite the language are the same , So when it comes For Example to remove duplicates from an array/list/vector of integers It's a core problem the one should know which you can build upon it so many katas , but When you'll scan all the katas On CW including its sub-problem to avoid the duplications , I Think it rather destrcutive than constructive one , so I agree with you that solving enough katas is improtant , But if you just took a look at the donald's comment below , you'll find he had considered this kata as a sub-problem as well
• The good point that you've mentioned in the previous comment that Most of my katas are Original so I'm sticking with Unique katas ideas , and we can't generalize from a one kata that (This Author) is Publishing duplicates , rather we can say , He haven't scanned tags properly , or some katas could be tweaked to deliver a harder version of it
• Hope that is Clear now .. regards .. Zizou