Underscore is just a convention, "k for k,g in groupby(iterable)" also works perfectly.

pretty cool

dang how did we all end up with the exact same code lmfao

lol cry more :D

hover your mouse over the clever button

Of course its not "bad code" in the sense that it works, is efficient and, dosent take up memory. But doing it this way is just hard to read for no reason.

It's not "bad code". It's compact, sure, but the approach is declarative. Yeah, maybe it would be more readable split up, but that would not change the approach.

Example of bad code just because you can do it in one line dosent mean you should.

Did the same, but I think it's not very easy to read?

looks so tidy

i did the same, eheh

Cool I came to the same solution but wrote out three to show readability

This is way older than ChatGPT, probably it was in its learning database.

This is character-for-character the exact same answer that ChatGPT gives. Not accusing, just saying.