There is a lack of tests for strict types. For example:

areEqual({ 0: 1 }, [1])

Yup!) Thx, updated it

Updated!) Thx :D

fixed!

Thx you for your feedback! I agree with you, I will fix it now.

Alright, thank you for your help. I have learned well and will approach the next task with a more correct approach.

By the way, would you like to write an adaptation of the task for Python? :D

Okay, I will rewrite the lore. If I leave it like this "A predicate can only be applied to primitive data types!", can I publish it? I seem to have fixed everything you mentioned.

hmm. give me one minute :)

And that also

We must be strict when it comes to the data we are searching - if it is null, then we are looking for null; if it is '2', then we are looking for '2' specifically as a string, and any values found with the number (like 2) type will be incorrect.

About predicates. Will this annotation be suitable?

A predicate can only be applied to primitive data types! Imagine it as if reference data types: objects, arrays, are all parts of a tree, branches like objects, or bird nests like arrays.

Hello again!) Sorry, I forgot to unpublish the task before making edits. I didn't have time to correct the mistakes yesterday. I will do it today and then I will write to you!) Thanks again for the feedback.

Just reviewed your solution. By the way, your solution is amazing :). Just wanted to write about that.