No, you were not, and that's unnecessarily strong language. If you must reflect with self-deprecation, let's say you were a no0b, just like any other beginner. And if as a beginner you passed the kata, great. And if as a beginner, you learned from others' code how to improve, GREAT, you got better. On principle I have upvoted your original comment, and welcome others to do the same to rectify this travesty of punishing what appears to me to be a beginner for asking a fair question.

I wrote this 2 years ago.
Damm i was a bitch

JavaScript is pretty much designed to give you some salvageable output in as many cases as possible rather than exceptions or errors. Unless you do something really wrong (like calling a method that doesn't exist), you can usually assume something like undefined, null or NaN will be returned, and/or that the language will silently handle edge cases for you (like slicing an array past its end). This answer happens to be a case where both things are happening.

outdated and not working anymore

no need for space in split
it's the default value

no

Lol, looking back on it now, I see that it's too much work.

so if it's equal to true return true but if it's false return false?
sound stupid innit?

use "return xNum===oNum" why using all the if else shit?

you will need to reverse the array after that

if you make a for loop to the length of the array and push to the binarr 2**i it will work with any length :D

that's too much work LOL