Im with you bro

OK OK

Hey, that's why the kata's here! We can all get better. ;)

TOOK ME WAY LONGER THAN I'D LIKE TO ADMIT.
I STARTED QUESTIONING MY KNOWLEDGE OF THIS LANGUAGE

GOD IM BAD

looking at the test cases seems like we need to change the order in the initial array, not return a new array with swapped values.

Description updated.

should explain in more detail what value is returned in the original clamp function (return the number input if the number falls within bounds else return either the lower bound or upper bound)

seconded

meh, I'd rather stick to exactly how the question was laid out

ಠ_ಠ

What a man of wisdom

Ah yes, I just figured since the email landed me under the python section thats what you were doing. 1e21 in javascript as far as I know is the same as 1000000000000000000000, so it should probably work as you said, yes. My solution does work, but I don't think it's necessary to change the description and test cases. I think the majority of people read "non-negative integer", they don't think of exponential notation.

LOL