there are so many katas like this, so ambiguous, that the challenge is no longer coding it, but rather guessing what the creator of the kata thought it means.

i embarrassingly admit, every now and then come back to it with a random idea and it always fails.

eww!

Just an idea, add negative numbers to the mix, i know it would break my code

Great Job

Honestly, great Job.

good fun kata!.

i think it's an enjoyable sort of kata, i would hint something about the validations on the description, i think it's also cool if you don't wish to list them. just mention that they have to be figured out or something.
good job!

I don't agree on them being equal. don't unpublish!

Great kata idea tho...
snail for jagged arrays n * m
where n and me can be >=0.

can't wait to put some time into this... THANK YOU!

i find this type of nonsense descriptions way too often...

lets try and make this better, the kata is not a riddle description...
making a problem hard by providing confusing descriptions is not how we practice coding.

how you go from the imput to the expected value in a concise way.

sometimes i feel like theres a course about LINQ out there in the cosmos, that i cant seem to find...
cause i wish i was able to read or code this like this... instead of handling nested loops...

advice read.... and i did try to debug a lot on my first go, i will try again later...

maybe im wrong... but i thought solving the Kata were meant to be the problem to solve.

not understanding the kata description riddle the problem.

clever AF!