• Missing return [] in initial solution setup

• No random tests

Very tricky kata, nice one, well done, congratulations.

Took me much longer than I'd like to admit! Very nice job with the sample tests.

Very minor spelling correction: Replace "dublicate letters" in the sample tests by "duplicate letters".

Notorious Kata!!

'adieu' & 'count' ? :P

Thanks for flagging this. Random tests are generated dynamically every test run so unfortunately there's no way to know the edge case that failed. Will keep tabs on this.

Thanks nandowastaken and congrats!

Holy shit, I spent 2 hours solving this, congrats guys, you guys made an amazing tough kata.

drop your favorite wordle starters
also i like the huxley ref

Good Kata, however when I first submitted I got 1 random test wrong, so I tried it again so I can just submit it and it was right. But now when I go back to try and find that edge case that gave me an error I can't find it anymore.

thank you elephantcastle2. merged.

https://www.codewars.com/kumite/62b4b47e40f3e9003dc38df5?sel=640b8d4c973058000f419a13 I tried creating another fork as the original text was updated

Looks good ! Approving is not possible though. Message: Description cannot be approved, recent changes from related record must be merged first.

I like the problem but I think it's a bit confusing at first glance. Why not make it clear in the description that the user has to figure out the sequence rule?

python translation ready; https://www.codewars.com/kumite/62b4b47e40f3e9003dc38df5?sel=62b4b47e40f3e9003dc38df5