Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
Thank you very much!!!
Don't do anything, I've already fixed it.
In Java the correct argument order is
assertEquals(expected, actual)
. Because of this SAMPLE tests should be:Fix this, and everything will be alright.
This is my first kata and I have a minimum experience of creating a katas.
Also, I'm not a java programmer.
What should I do to make things work fine?
I have to fix the tests and do the following:
assertEquals (localTwiceAsOld (son, dad), TwiceAsOld.TwiceAsOld (son, dad)); ?
petrosernivka, I had already fixed it, and now sample tests are wrong, again, please check that before approving a fork (even if it's yours ;)).
Fixed it again.
Wouldn't that mean the argument order on the basic tests is backwards as well?
mmmh, well... Might be that I didn't get your message the right way. Well, anyway, forget that.
I thought you were going to fix the kata issue with this fork. And now I realized you've published the fork after Chrono79 have fixed everything through the editor.
The issues should be fixed by kata author or faulty translation author. And I pretty much don't care.
:(
and whatever? forking translations of someone else doesn't grant any points or %, so why do you bother that much?
And moreover: why didn't you do it yourself, then? Seriously, you're annoying with all of that. "O_o"
The kata was created just a couple days ago, and the author is still active. Only he can approve/reject translations now.
Can't you just edit it? O_o
Damn, I even did that... x)
well, let's just wait one week to reject this, then... x)
Dunno why but it doesn't allow me to reject it. Maybe I have to wait for a week to do it?
Sample tests had still flipped actual/expected.
Wrong argument order in
assertEquals(TwiceAsOld.TwiceAsOld(dad, son), localTwiceAsOld(dad, son));
.Loading more items...