?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

I can respect this. Just please don't ask me to review your code for PR.

Thank you for the clarification! 😊

Strings are immutable in Go. So if you append to a string, what it has to create a whole new string every time. String builder on the other hand is mutable, so it's going to be more memory efficient.

bro has no life xd

Bro why u use ASCII?
Now we have UTF-8

early returning! smart

nice but unreadable (for me) :D

You may assume that the board passed in is valid in the context of a game of Tic-Tac-Toe.

Holy crap! I thought I was having a stroke whenever I saw this solution. Without your comment I probably would have quit trying to learn JavaScript. xD

)))

nice one!

Hey! Is there a specific reason to implement a separate type? It's overcomplicating a task for Go newcomers.

I don't know if it's the best practice or not but I meet the strings.Builder concept, thanks

javascript it self