hi, sorry for the massive delay. can you add the new sample test changes for string ops? this looks good for a merge otherwise.

Yes, that is redundant and ambiguous. I've changed it now.

example added

cool, added

i've changed the random tests to mix them together

I've added some tests for ^ in the example tests, if they're ok i'll copy them to the main ones

understood, i hope the description is less ambiguous now.

i have added random fuzz tests for parentheses, and some new sample tests for incorrect parentheses.

I think I have managed to fix all the problems addressed. If you have any sample tests to suggest, please tell me in a new comment.

oh, I see. will get to it soon.

• I can add unrandomized tests from the full suite.
• I got a comment from a different user about how they needed clarification. I'll remove that extra rule.
• Make sense, I will chenge this to the correct wording.
• I do not understand. Underflow will never happen in any tests, should I elaborate on that?

characters which are not commands should be no-ops. I've added that as well.

Added an extra point for it.

Will add that to the spec.

oh, I will add that the outermost parentheses are not to be included. I will also clarify on *.