Idk renis, your ego seems to be a bit bigger then it needs to. I just looked at your solution and it is hard to read and follow, its just one big block of code and also strings are hardcoded. I mean nothing catastrophic but best practices wise having to change code in 2 places to change "A good fight" for example is not 'best' (problem only grows with the growth of code).

Blind4Basics code on the other hand I really like. It's so easy on the eye and as far as I can tell follows all the modern Java conventions. Everything camelCase, consts are upper with underscore, everything is properly marked as final or private, code blocks and logic blocks are nietly separated. That is a code of somebody I would be happy to work with on single codebase.

You keep arguing about syntax. Who cares about the number of tabs I use? Except you, I mean...

Grow up. Syntax isn't what makes a code good or bad. Structure is. And you obviously aren't capable of discussing the structure of the logic/code, here.

Let's face it, your only problem with my code is just that you're not competent enough to grab the way it's written. Your code, is a total mess, on the other hand:

• there is no overall structure. Nothing is standing out, all functions are sticking together, and it's impossible to see where a function begins or end when looking at your code.
• almost everything is hardcoded. In mine, all the outputs are abstracted away => mine <=> easy for change. Yours <=> where the fuck do I need to put that change???

When you try to put arguments like this, at the very least back up your positions. You don't like my style? Ok fine. But you don't seem competent enough to judge what is best practice or not, sorry.

Edit: btw, if you're arguing about the way I name my variables, clean up your own code first: you're using C# conventions about curly brackets, not java ones.

Dunning-Krüger master...