Equals(...) works to compare two functions that return collections, like std::vector, but if you're comparing a function that returns an collection and an already declared collection, then Equals() doesn't work and you have to use Is().EqualToContainer(...)
Answers are generated on pre-newlines now. Thanks!
Fixed
Equals(...)
works to compare two functions that return collections, likestd::vector
, but if you're comparing a function that returns an collection and an already declared collection, then Equals() doesn't work and you have to useIs().EqualToContainer(...)
Answers are generated on pre-newlines now. Thanks!
Lately I've been working with uint64_t,
out of habit I've written this type...
Fixed to unsigned.
Yes, this is left over from past verification methods. Thanks!
Removed.
Included.
Thanks! That's really better! I completely forgot about
lambda expressions...
Fixed.
Fixed so all assertions throw extra messages
Fixed, I'm not principled))
I'm from
old C school
, where declaring variables inside a loop was considered bad form XD.I'm still getting used to
modern standards...
Fixed.
I just forgot to change the data type...
T_T
Fixed.
Fixed, I guess... Thank you!
Fixed.
C++ Translation kumited.
If you come across
\n
, then:"fsdwr\n prpp"
will become
\n
terminates the given line urgently and wraps the text to another.There is no
\t
in the tests, so don't worry about itOh, I didn't know about the existence of such kata! I will change the conditions and probably the task itself soon. Thanks!
Loading more items...