Oh, let me share a link to an authoritative resource too!

https://primes.utm.edu/notes/faq/negative_primes.html

You see, you are all right wrong damn I dont know ;]

richardwellerson: if you have a definition in the description (the usual one btw), why are you trying to use another one?

Per Wikipedia, a prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

There are only two positive divisors, and that is right. It legit says there are two positive divisors.

A prime number admits exactly 4 divisors, because it is also its negative divisors.

If you think of a number that has negative dividers, then it should also have twice the amount of factors because of symetry. However, we don't count negative numbers as dividers, so there are only two dividers.

https://www.expii.com/t/prime-numbers-definition-examples-9019#:~:text=A%20prime%20number%20is%20a%20natural%20number%20with%20exactly%202,1%20or%20the%20number%20itself.

A prime number admits exactly 4 divisors, because it is also its negative divisors.

That's wrong. 100% wrong.