Loading collection data...
Collections are a way for you to organize kata so that you can create your own training routines. Every collection you create is public and automatically sharable with other warriors. After you have added a few kata to a collection you and others can train on the kata contained within the collection.
Get started now by creating a new collection.
Fixed.
Hm... I grasped (wrong guess, according to your comment) from the details page, that we should put
0
under the pointer.The last part of the explanation of
,
operator: "If the end-of-file has been reached, outputs a zero to the bit under the pointer."Well, the count of instructions executed isn't tested AFAIK, so practically it doesn't really matter.
Besides, there are things that matter more ;-) Like, what should be done if the input stream is exhausted and a
,
is attempted? It's undefined even in the original BF, and implementations choose all kinds of possible results (always-1
, always0
or not writing anything at all). I'd expect people argue about this more than that one aesthetic distinction ;-)No, it's not. It's functionally identical no matter you jump across the
]
or pass it.Please don't raise issues on things that literally does not affect anything. It's a suggestion.
You must write your code in one line!
NO not really it's a very simple solution in F# very simple!
OK, maybe I am wrong thinking a bit of search doesn't harm. Anyway since two days the "Setup solution" had been modified with "open System", just aafter my previous post.
You're overly defensive over everything about your katas, g964.
There are times to be defensive (e.g people claiming issues when their code is wrong). This is not one of them.
You can literally just change 1 character and resolve the potential confusion. Why not do it? It's not contributing to anything, and now you're just saying "but this is part of the 'difficulty'". It doesn't hold water at all.
It's not a problem of ease or not; I think it's good to learn that libraries exist and how they are used. Isn't that right? If someone doesn't know something like "Int64" he could google it:-)
But you know, you can put that in initial code section. It's almost effortless.
int64 is the same as System.Int64 so you have to open System. 8 solutions have been submitted as you can see at the top of the page.
Yes it was. Corrected.
Of course it's an issue !
I'm sorry I don't think that is an issue.
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
Loading more items...