Needs lots of other decimals with varying number of significant digits.
And 1 random test cases is far from enough. Not to mention that you pass -2 as the second parameter, basically nullifying whatever random tests are supposed to do.
The function does not need to deal with very big numbers, or any invalid input which was not mentioned.
Except you have string inputs. Strings are not numbers.
Also, roundAndPad(-1.1232,19) == "-1.1232000000000000000" does not make much sense because double precision floats doesn't have 19 digits of precision anyway, so if you're rounding it to 19 decimal places you'll get stuff like -1.1231999999999999762.
Needs lots of other decimals with varying number of significant digits.
And 1 random test cases is far from enough. Not to mention that you pass
-2as the second parameter, basically nullifying whatever random tests are supposed to do.Except you have string inputs. Strings are not numbers.
Also,
roundAndPad(-1.1232,19) == "-1.1232000000000000000"does not make much sense because double precision floats doesn't have 19 digits of precision anyway, so if you're rounding it to 19 decimal places you'll get stuff like-1.1231999999999999762.Taking types into consideration, this is not true. The test suite still expects a string when
dis negative, rather than the numbernitself.