Good job. Thank you.

Fixed.

Thanks for noticing.

Indeed, the solution does not work for bigger strings.

I will rewrite the Kata to consider the mentioned behavior. The idea of creating stream wrappers is to properly handle streams (using less memory, since we do not need the entire text in memory) and it does not make sense if the wrapper only deals with a single chunk.

Sorry. It was me. I did not know it was needed to mark something else as resolved.

Thanks, Concker88.
Nice job. It looks right.

Try to do with few teams in a paper.

Thanks :)

Welcome

In my opinion, there is a difference: in one side you can use any strategy to solve the proposed kata and in the other side there is a print on the stdout that looks useless for this problem. For this specific kata, there is not a good reason to print anything to solve the proposed problem, so I think it is ok to omit this from the spec, since it is a hint for a real world good practice. If you are not happy with that, you can vote in the kata as insatisfied. I will keep it as it is.

:|