ok. Understood. I will look into fixing that. However, Im currently way north of the arctic circle with very spotty internet, so will take a couple of days

You cut the text, it says:
"This can be solved by translating any instruction to turn the dial left, to a corresponding right turn. A left turn of 11, for example, would leave the dial at label 8, which means that the smallest equivalent number of turns to the right is 7."

And there is an example with a turn to the right of size 10, so should be more clear now.

I want them to be handled differently.

Markin this as solves. As this is specified in the description and I have motivated the reasoning elsewhere in these threads.

Could you elaborate, not sure that I follow.

As I wrote in another thread:

The reason I decided to filter out anything that was divisible by 9 is that I do not think a Dial Combination Safe ever would have a sequence where the same label showed up in sequence.
I do not think one of those old lock ever could have a password combination that was, for example, 1-2-3-3-5 since going from 3 to 3 means not turning the dial at all.

So, to fit into the narrative a bit, I decided that the passwords here also would not have any such sequences.

Hi, the reason I decided to filter out anything that was divisible by 9 is that I do not think a Dial Combination Safe ever would have a sequence where the same label showed up in sequence.
I do not think one of those old lock ever could have a password combination that was, for example, 1-2-3-3-5 since going from 3 to 3 means not turning the dial at all.

So, to fit into the narrative a bit, I decided that the passwords here also would not have any such sequences.

That is actually by design. I made it like that such that it would be different handling for L and R.
The only reason I made the answer take a product of R-turns and the label it landed on, was to force the user to translate the L turns into R turns at all.
And since any L turn could be translated to different number of R turns, depending on how many full rotations, I decided to put in that info for the Left turns.

Have a look now. Now there are 100 random tests and it is random sequences generated instead.

Thanks

This should be solved now.
May use your solution as the correct solution?

Just saw that myself. Publishing new now

You are right. Im on it

I wanted to avoid going via strings.

Sorry that me changing the Kata broke your solution. If you have the chance, I'd love to see it resubmitted. Should be enough to remove the package of your code.

Thanks for this. It should now be fixed.
Please keep in mind that the packages have also been removed from the tests and the initial solution.