OCaml translation (author gone)

For the anti-cheat, is there a way to overwrite the global eval function to throw an error?

Despite the instructions, I still see it in several solutions here by assigning it to a variable outside the exported function.

Missing empty strings and one-word string (no spaces) in sample && fixed tests of

• CS

• Crystal

• C#

• D

• Elixir

• Go (Only empty string test is missing)

• Java

• JS

• PHP (Only one-word string test is missing)

• Racket

• Rust (Only empty string test is missing)

• TS

This kata is a subject to deduplication process here: https://github.com/codewars/content-issues/issues/196.
Please join the discussion to help us identify duplicate kata and retire them.

expected 'Please provide your mass in Kg' to equal 'Easy tiger, this is far too much power! Something is broken or you are a God, either way report this to reception please'

Input validation order is not specified; the description did not say the validation should be done in order, and by common sense value checks should not come before type checks.

How about this?

public class Solution { public static string[] StringToArray(string str) { return new string[0]; } } }

Test Failed
Expected is <System.String[1]>, actual is <System.String[0]>
Values differ at index [0]
Missing: < <string.Empty> >

2. Test Failed
   Expected is <System.String[6]>, actual is <System.String[0]>
   Values differ at index [0]
   Missing: < "63C4PJK", <string.Empty>, "UG1"... >

3. Test Failed
   Expected is <System.String[2]>, actual is <System.String[0]>
   Values differ at index [0]
   Missing: < <string.Empty>, "NGPIQNZ3LDFZ46GQ" >

4. Test Failed
   Expected is <System.String[3]>, actual is <System.String[0]>
   Values differ at index [0]
   Missing: < "0DTFT", "91XM2ANRPN6OK0PB", <string.Empty> >

etc.

How can test wait for <string.Empty> if only non-empty strings are allowed in result array?

Some languages have random number of spaces between the words while others always use a single space. The JavaScript version which is very likely to be the original one uses the latter.

Add test cases for words with in all lower case.

No random tests in Go

Expected '#("Robin" "Singh"), but instead got '("Robin" "Singh")
what # mean? I has forget about racket,can someone help?
how can I return a form like '#("Robin" "Singh")?

Description :

It is likely that this "We will take the relationship between Joules counted by the machine and the extra Calories burnt by the person to be a linear relation with the weight of that person." is stopping solutions.

This is a low level kata (programming wise) however a lot of novice programmers might not be able to deduce from that line alone how to relate the variables.

You might want to add something explicit like "every 100 kg then ..." otherwis this might be stuck at a low number of solutions.