OP solved it, closing

16 series ~~

I agree to both of these. At the time I wrote this I was still new to ruby's methods, and I still forget most of them :x

Removed the note from the description.

He's right, be more specific in terms of what error needs to be raised.

This isn't an issue, you can print the inputs.

Any error will do.

EDIT: Raised an issue about it.

same problem no info

Known new runner issue. Fixed.

(It's still a bad kata though)

@Voile .. that's the Point

• If any Changes occurs to widen the range of tests to accomodate negatives then The Whole kata should be re-written from scratch , Because it Will not match Neither the Notes' Section , nor the Test cases .. thanks for your ideation .. Regards .. Zizou

But the description clearly says

Only positive numbers passed to the function

So adding negative numbers would be out of spec.

@seasidetesting .. Well .. thanks Stephan for pointing out , but Since We are interested in Forming the largest which came from Positive digits , then What the idea behind adding negatives ?? ... regards .. Zizou

Don't even allow Math

Sounds like a good idea, python also has a complex number type that should probably be checked for