Seems a little bit like a new kata, the old and now newer C# code included;-). Ok, not really new, i was able to identfy it, same idea and similar description;-). But i think really hard and surely time intensive work at the end with "clean code" too - many thanks for all the efforts! Hope "all" are happy now and many try to solve it:-)! I think your ranking is ok too, not really important for me. Often it depends on your personal experience for the special problem and here i think you normally will not find a "copy & paste solution" too (as for N x N);-)!

Thanks for your translation, it's approved now. Saw your python solution too, so thanks again for the work and following updates;-)!

Yes in your case 'computer science student' counts... only students with practical experience count, theoretical knowledge is not enough:-)...

Yes, i remember our "discussion" two years ago and your discouragement - and there was not really a help from my side. The point was, that the other one was an extract from this one - part of my "discouragement" that nobody solved this one;-). Same with the "reduced fraction" kata. So i did not want to put any work into these two easier ones, included the work for your suggestions - as i said before, i reduced (some times complete) my "work" on codewars and for own katas long time before;-). And second there existed many solutions without your "problems"... So perhaps a short explanation to understand my reasons a little bit better...

Good work, wrote a message just before;-)!

Really quickly done and short too, it's just online for python;-)! Probably your job area, you wrote it before or/and copy & paste or simply a genius...:-)... Good work, thanks;-)!

Now you have to consider the python translation of "@lsnbr", there's no problem if versions differ "a little bit"... I mark this issue here as resolved, for me it's only a suggestion, because your issue was fulfilled yesterday and i got no answer, if you can solve it now without the "correct solution" (i don't think so, but maybe i'm wrong;-)). Don't think that "proper" is a reason to raise a new issue here;-).

For me it's really ok and (very;-)) good work - haven't looked for each detail, because i reduced my "work and time" here! Differs a little bit from my old one, but should be no problem - and no issue with random tests too, better than my quick "solution" yesterday. So approval follows... Thanks:-)! So probably the next discussion will start @monadius...;-)

It's really ok, no problem;-)!

You like deals;-)? I have no problems with your changes, only if i have to invest my time again for this old kata;-)... I inserted these (kind of) random tests only to see what happens here;-)...

By the way all solutions will be invalid, so new 5 years to wait;-)? Perhaps i should delete the kata? And by the way i published the other kata for "reduced fractions" later, because nobody solved this one... and some other easier ones too

I don't remember but perhaps this is/was a point not to allow each kind of random tests, the equations/parameters don't lead to your problem (i think), only a "simple converter" works... It was my first own kata and i added different parts to make it a littlbe bit harder;-)...

Contributors are allowed since beginning - so you have permission? Proper...? Why? Are you able to solve it without a working solution? The tests are not wrong and work, perhaps a little bit different as expected;-) - so why it is an issue again? I stopped my work on own katas, so this was the easiest way to fulfill your issue...

Good luck for your translation, added some simple random tests;-)

added, waiting for approval;-)