Hi, thank you for your suggestion! I reviewed my reply to Kirill12 which you mentioned... but in that comment, I now feel that I actually gave away too many clues and made it less fun to solve the puzzle. I understand music theory can be confusing to people but I'm trying to think of a way to communicate effectively without giving away too much... If anyone has a good idea, I'd appreciate chiming in!

Oops, forgot to delete the line after testing... now all good :)

Fixed, thank you!

Fixed, thank you!

Ah, oops! Thank you for pointing out :)

C++ Translation added, your review will be appreciated :)

Your advice helped me - thank you! :)

You're right, hard-coding the size allocates more than necessary and can be unsafe when making changes in the future. I can fix this, but actually there is a story behind... I was using a vector of vectors first, and generating and solving 100 mazes was taking about 1100 milliseconds. But when I changed to using the fixed array the time improved to around 600 milliseconds. I understand this goes against best practice, but I thought performance was important, also... There might also be other ways which are better and I'm not aware of. I would appreciate sharing any further thoughts! Thank you for examining my translation, once again! :)

.

.

.

Hi, I really appreciate you looking over my translation and giving me some tips! That's right, I realize what I did with the 'include's makes the code hard to understand. I will fix this. By hard-coding the maze size, do you mean the pre-allocated 2d array of ints being used here...?

There are 200 random tests in total, with the size varying from 1 through 100 repeated twice. If you think I should adjust the amount, please let me know!

Kind regards,
Hiro

I enjoyed this kata!
I just did a C++ Translation. Your review is appreciated :)