It might be easier to read when you have pages of code with many different functions.

Not only are you trying to be pedantic, but you also don't even seem to understand the rule you're trying to be pedantic about.
That method does accept two parameters, since two is in the range of 0..N. The opposite of accept is reject, and if that function rejected
two parameters, the tests would not pass.

Also, why are you criticizing people for improving the function by not limiting the amount of names a person can have? At least hundreds of millions of people in the world have more than two names.

When people this smart exist, why do I even try lol

This is pedantic but the description does say:

Create a function ... that accepts two parameters

Although the test cases doesn't test for the amount of parameters, this solution would technically be incorrect as it accepts 0 to N parameters.

Nice
i wanted to try something like this but couldn't. Thanks for the help

smart!!
i didn't knoq you could mutiply a number by a string !

one line fantastic

Oh, sorry about that. Of course.

Please use spoiler flag next time.

Love it.