Sorry, I can't really help you with f#, but an "issue" is when the kata is faulty in some way. Maybe a test expects incorrect results, or maybe something else is going on, or maybe the solution setup has incorrect syntax, or whatever. An issue generally requires the author of the kata or a moderator to change the kata in some way. You probably wanted to post this as a "question". Questions are for help understanding the kata, or help with your code.

Again, I can't help you with f#, but if you really set up the tests locally correctly, and there's a discrepency, is it possible that you're using a different version of f# than this kata is? The kata is using f# version 4.1, which came out 4 or 5 years ago from what I can tell. Is it possible that your code uses language features that weren't available in 4.1?

Not a kata issue.

Then the best place to ask is probably Codewars Discord (link on left panel).

That was the first place I looked. It doesn't say one way or the other. And there's no way to comment.

This is not related to the kata. I think you should find the anwser in Codewars documentation (link in left panel): https://docs.codewars.com/languages/julia

Crap I'm never going to get my mind around functional programming.

Nice. I knew the simpliest solution involved using "for" but I just couldn't figure out how.

Thank you for spelling this out! I have been spinning my wheels for several nights on this problem. I get frustrated with kata that require the users to round or truncate answers to the author's choice, precisely because so many authors use the different terms interchangeably.

Nice kata, but I agree with the earlier comments about truncation of the answer. It would be simpler to round to 6 decimal places rather than truncate.

Ugh I'm never going to get the hang of functional programming.

I'm not sure if it was there when you did this, but it's up there now.

Same here, Clojure tests are clearly broken.