If two producers are selling the same product (i.e. the same id), wouldn't that skew the results? I'm having a hard time understanding the difference, but there definitely is one when you compare the output tables.
But with my code the outcome of other test cases also results in "fractional people" but I don't see how that matters if we're looking for years. How does 1213 people differ from 1214.4 if all we're looking for is if it's > 1200?
Same
2nd fail test said that, there instead of array [0,0] function have to be []
same thing happend to me
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
If two producers are selling the same product (i.e. the same id), wouldn't that skew the results? I'm having a hard time understanding the difference, but there definitely is one when you compare the output tables.
Despite the condition being 2 or less in stock, "stock < 2" also passes the tests
But with my code the outcome of other test cases also results in "fractional people" but I don't see how that matters if we're looking for years. How does 1213 people differ from 1214.4 if all we're looking for is if it's > 1200?
I believe that test case expected an empty array to be returned, whereas here that'd be [0, 0], no?
I'll double-check though, I've realized my accepted solution is suspicious anyway.
Where do you think it should fail?
Can someone please explain how this passes the [+0, +0] test case?
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution
This comment is hidden because it contains spoiler information about the solution