It's ok. Thanks for considering my work. Approved!

• OCaml translation

Please review and approve, thanks !

This translation modifies the description : commas in the lists were all over the place.

I get it, but learning gain from this kata is negative. It teaches very bad practice, that's why I raised this comment. Not a big deal, maybe at least some curious begginer will read this.

See post just below.

I agree that a class is not appropriated here. But it's a detail of implementation that doesn't have much consequences, and it won't be changed for the reasons I told.

Thanks to @akar-0 for this translation. Thanks to @dfhwze for approving it. +1 for you both.

This kata makes no sens in JS. It should be just a function not a Array.prototype that not modifying itself.

I have the same problem. It's not broken although I can't seem to figure out how to fix it (I'm writing it in Python).

Hi, now I see that you didn't get any answer.

(1) listOf(...).map { ... }.joinToString(...)

is equal

(2) listOf(...).joinToString(...) { ... }

Intelij simplifying (1) into (2) automatically.

Why that? The kyu is not given by the author.

Is this really kotlin 6kyu kata?

There is no "in a row" rule. Check the examples in the kata description.

Imho the last test case is invalid.

[1,5,1,2,3] should return 50 not 250. Why twice 1 is counted a 200, when in description there are words like ONE or SINGLE. At least description should be changed.

EDIT. Now I see that I might do this kata wrong. Please check my solutions. I completed it without respecting "in a row order".

Don't post solutions in Discourse, please.